Tea at Three
Scenario balance report
Games with no balance used/recorded: 28 (11 on the archive and 17 on ROAR)
Attacker wins (British/American): 13
Defender wins (German): 15
Range, where the higher the percentage, the more favourable the attacking side is. The range-width is the confidence value.
ELO vs Outcome
Attacker ELO | Defender ELO | Expected chance to win | Date | Outcome |
---|
1049 | 1043 | 51% | 2019-11-28 | Won |
1177 | 1136 | 56% | 2013-07-01 | Lost |
966 | 1005 | 44% | 2013-06-30 | Lost |
1159 | 1177 | 47% | 2013-06-11 | Lost |
948 | 1026 | 39% | 2013-04-27 | Lost |
1026 | 948 | 61% | 2013-04-27 | Won |
1087 | 1087 | 50% | 2012-12-20 | Won |
963 | 966 | 50% | 2012-10-26 | Lost |
1040 | 943 | 64% | 2012-10-04 | Lost |
914 | 1097 | 26% | 2012-10-03 | Lost |
1073 | 974 | 64% | 2012-10-02 | Lost |
Attacking (3 wins) average ELOs: 1036.5 vs 1036.5 has a 50% of winning (if the scenario was perfectly balanced).