Chinese Alamo
Scenario balance report
Games with no balance used/recorded: 40 (11 on the archive and 29 on ROAR)
Attacker wins (Japanese): 22
Defender wins (Chinese): 18
Scenario Balance Over Time
Range, where the higher the percentage, the more favourable the attacking side is. The range-width is the confidence value.
ELO vs Outcome
| Attacker ELO | Defender ELO | Expected chance to win | Date | Outcome |
|---|
| 1210 | 1176 | 55% | 2025-10-08 | Lost |
| 869 | 924 | 42% | 2025-09-17 | Lost |
| 1140 | 1072 | 60% | 2025-03-08 | Won |
| 980 | 1264 | 16% | 2023-02-11 | Lost |
| 1113 | 993 | 67% | 2022-06-01 | Won |
| 1000 | 1028 | 46% | 2016-10-02 | Won |
| 1059 | 694 | 89% | 2016-09-10 | Won |
| 1031 | 1045 | 48% | 2013-06-23 | Won |
| 1344 | 1282 | 59% | 2012-05-05 | Won |
| 1232 | 1068 | 72% | 2010-10-11 | Won |
| 880 | 1189 | 14% | 2010-03-13 | Won |
Attacking (8 wins) average ELOs: 1078 vs 1066.8 has a 51.61% of winning (if the scenario was perfectly balanced).