Tea at Three
Scenario balance report
Games with no balance used/recorded: 14
Attacker wins (British/American): 5
Defender wins (German): 9
Scenario Balance Over Time
Range, where the higher the percentage, the more favourable the attacking side is. The range-width is the confidence value.
ELO vs Outcome
| Attacker ELO | Defender ELO | Expected chance to win | Date | Outcome |
|---|
| 1030 | 1110 | 39% | 2024-03-24 | Lost |
| 1215 | 1039 | 73% | 2019-11-28 | Won |
| 1133 | 1085 | 57% | 2013-07-01 | Lost |
| 992 | 996 | 49% | 2013-06-30 | Lost |
| 1042 | 1133 | 37% | 2013-06-11 | Lost |
| 1018 | 988 | 54% | 2013-04-27 | Lost |
| 988 | 1018 | 46% | 2013-04-27 | Won |
| 1182 | 1127 | 58% | 2012-12-20 | Won |
| 1140 | 753 | 90% | 2012-11-13 | Won |
| 1342 | 1178 | 72% | 2012-11-10 | Won |
| 963 | 992 | 46% | 2012-10-26 | Lost |
| 998 | 1129 | 32% | 2012-10-04 | Lost |
| 982 | 1101 | 34% | 2012-10-03 | Lost |
| 1060 | 988 | 60% | 2012-10-02 | Lost |
Attacking (5 wins) average ELOs: 1077.5 vs 1045.5 has a 54.59% of winning (if the scenario was perfectly balanced).