User: CWO_19
| Name: | Nate Gregg |
| Registered on: | 2021-05-20 01:08:41 |
| Last Login: | 2025-08-10 18:54:26 |
User Notes:
Owns: 626 Scenarios
Played: 195 (101 unique scenarios: 16%)
Playing Record:
Rating: 914 Show Calculations
View Uploaded Files?
Worst losing streak: 8 games lost (From 2020-12-20 to 2021-01-09 [20 days])
| Date | Calculations | New Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-24 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.66708085770765 vs John Barkoviak (879.26411543712) | 979 |
| 2020-01-30 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 978.65341255336] expected: 0.5306816115614 vs cgregg (1000) | 996 |
| 2020-01-30 | Rated: 996. expected: 0.51867363923552 vs Chris Gregg (983.01818843004) | 1011 |
| 2020-03-01 | Rated: 1011. expected: 0.56211246751321 vs Chris Gregg (967.61574488557) | 993 |
| 2020-03-01 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 993.01240103958] expected: 0.48990971379727 vs cgregg (986) | 977 |
| 2020-03-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 976.68951188109] expected: 0.53636042106312 vs cgregg (1002) | 962 |
| 2020-03-15 | Rated: 962. expected: 0.42173280768468 vs Chris Gregg (1016.836466526) | 949 |
| 2020-03-30 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.3850461219528 vs Chris Gregg (1030.3319163719) | 969 |
| 2020-03-30 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 968.67852409751] expected: 0.56060603995369 vs cgregg (1011) | 987 |
| 2020-05-01 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.49127897036569 vs Chris Gregg (993.06060672148) | 1003 |
| 2020-05-08 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.53765994649697 vs Chris Gregg (976.78153377318) | 1002 |
| 2020-05-15 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.53450306253436 vs Chris Gregg (977.98665206109) | 985 |
| 2020-05-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 984.8959019989] expected: 0.51453686790046 vs cgregg (995) | 969 |
| 2020-06-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 969.36108177172] expected: 0.55963796323062 vs cgregg (1011) | 987 |
| 2020-06-15 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.49123440241734 vs Chris Gregg (993.09158517662) | 1003 |
| 2020-07-04 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1003.2804991226] expected: 0.4622512886351 vs cgregg (977) | 986 |
| 2020-07-04 | Rated: 986. expected: 0.4881899948388 vs Chris Gregg (994.20795876368) | 970 |
| 2020-07-15 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.44292976027416 vs Chris Gregg (1009.8300385985) | 956 |
| 2020-07-29 | Rated: 956. expected: 0.57904309129389 vs John Barkoviak (900.61070288376) | 969 |
| 2020-08-01 | Rated: 969. expected: 0.42149792654499 vs Chris Gregg (1024.0037909273) | 956 |
| 2020-08-01 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 955.51206635056] expected: 0.61516651504269 vs cgregg (1037) | 943 |
| 2020-08-03 | Rated: 943. expected: 0.5797033016677 vs John Barkoviak (887.14008180517) | 924 |
| 2020-08-12 | Rated: 924. expected: 0.52632499770898 vs John Barkoviak (905.69058745853) | 907 |
| 2020-08-29 | Rated: 907. expected: 0.47766111564664 vs John Barkoviak (922.53298738522) | 924 |
| 2020-10-20 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 923.71484429931] expected: 0.67287106295724 vs cgregg (1049) | 945 |
| 2020-10-20 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.38349858331277 vs Chris Gregg (1027.4681259854) | 965 |
| 2020-11-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 964.72804533399] expected: 0.56195334178312 vs cgregg (1008) | 983 |
| 2020-11-05 | Rated: 983. expected: 0.48990238877313 vs Chris Gregg (990.01749306294) | 999 |
| 2020-11-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 999.32312355926] expected: 0.46362149128644 vs cgregg (974) | 1014 |
| 2020-11-10 | Rated: 1014. expected: 0.57826637975823 vs Chris Gregg (959.16411227883) | 1027 |
| 2020-11-13 | Rated: 1027. expected: 0.61495312455019 vs Chris Gregg (945.6686364311) | 1007 |
| 2020-11-13 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1007.3215000144] expected: 0.43939392585631 vs cgregg (965) | 989 |
| 2020-11-18 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 989.3821056418] expected: 0.49081644458177 vs cgregg (983) | 1005 |
| 2020-11-18 | Rated: 1005. expected: 0.55405143630197 vs Chris Gregg (967.29387377338) | 1019 |
| 2020-11-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1019.2703540383] expected: 0.4057693079595 vs cgregg (953) | 1032 |
| 2020-11-26 | Rated: 1032. expected: 0.6293678926905 vs Chris Gregg (940.0153821453) | 1044 |
| 2020-12-04 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1043.8602274339] expected: 0.33918122530763 vs cgregg (928) | 1055 |
| 2020-12-04 | Rated: 1055. expected: 0.68859313094486 vs Chris Gregg (917.14620079016) | 1065 |
| 2020-12-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1064.9650198098] expected: 0.28713905769282 vs cgregg (907) | 1074 |
| 2020-12-10 | Rated: 1074. expected: 0.73384563607162 vs Chris Gregg (897.81155015383) | 1083 |
| 2020-12-20 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1082.5169396457] expected: 0.24713093121457 vs cgregg (889) | 1058 |
| 2020-12-20 | Rated: 1058. expected: 0.69723352401003 vs Chris Gregg (913.09181020113) | 1036 |
| 2020-12-27 | Rated: 1036. expected: 0.64085597518165 vs Chris Gregg (935.40328296946) | 1015 |
| 2020-12-27 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1015.4926087942] expected: 0.41521034156277 vs cgregg (956) | 997 |
| 2021-01-02 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.53202926517714 vs Chris Gregg (974.71326906999) | 980 |
| 2021-01-02 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 979.97506351433] expected: 0.51729836805516 vs cgregg (992) | 965 |
| 2021-01-09 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.43921675490007 vs Chris Gregg (1007.4464522222) | 951 |
| 2021-01-09 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 950.9450638432] expected: 0.60085409116392 vs cgregg (1022) | 938 |
| 2021-01-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 938.17239476044] expected: 0.63584714857558 vs cgregg (1035) | 959 |
| 2021-01-26 | Rated: 959. expected: 0.42058709092513 vs Chris Gregg (1014.6528912456) | 978 |
| 2021-02-10 | Rated: 978. expected: 0.4739587846062 vs Chris Gregg (996.11167815519) | 995 |
| 2021-02-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 994.8333188926] expected: 0.47722978336918 vs cgregg (979) | 1010 |
| 2021-02-25 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1010.1046719604] expected: 0.4340367777333 vs cgregg (964) | 992 |
| 2021-02-25 | Rated: 992. expected: 0.51422782747925 vs Chris Gregg (982.11082311253) | 976 |
| 2021-03-26 | Rated: 976. expected: 0.30959723335095 vs Martin Vicca (1115.3221808035) | 966 |
| 2021-04-16 | Rated: 966. expected: 0.28565168676795 vs Martin Vicca (1125.2292922707) | 957 |
| 2021-06-02 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.5731283857995 vs John Barkoviak (905.81814308591) | 939 |
| 2021-06-16 | Rated: 939. expected: 0.52134601045508 vs John Barkoviak (924.1582514315) | 954 |
| 2021-08-07 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.56462504215885 vs John Barkoviak (908.84132376606) | 936 |
| 2021-09-03 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 935.93199865092] expected: 0.58977821316049 vs cgregg (999) | 955 |
| 2021-09-03 | Rated: 955. expected: 0.46390211407013 vs Chris Gregg (980.12709717886) | 972 |
| 2021-09-08 | Rated: 972. expected: 0.47261434576909 vs Alan Lynott (991.04856479297) | 973 |
| 2021-09-14 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.5144274965215 vs Chris Gregg (962.97196482911) | 957 |
| 2021-09-14 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 956.53832011131] expected: 0.53227999571414 vs cgregg (979) | 942 |
| 2021-09-18 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.42576618319786 vs Chris Gregg (993.96704013715) | 960 |
| 2021-09-18 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 960.37548213767] expected: 0.52247034281556 vs cgregg (976) | 977 |
| 2021-09-24 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 977.09453310777] expected: 0.47398339144666 vs cgregg (959) | 960 |
| 2021-09-24 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.47723091420603 vs Chris Gregg (975.83253147371) | 945 |
| 2021-09-29 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 944.72861074541] expected: 0.5661989569944 vs cgregg (991) | 931 |
| 2021-09-29 | Rated: 931. expected: 0.39524995321168 vs Chris Gregg (1004.8816333762) | 918 |
| 2021-10-06 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 918.35200149723] expected: 0.63959804860486 vs cgregg (1018) | 907 |
| 2021-10-06 | Rated: 907. expected: 0.33062583709636 vs Chris Gregg (1029.5328624446) | 896 |
| 2021-10-13 | Rated: 896. expected: 0.30373378359827 vs Chris Gregg (1040.1128892317) | 918 |
| 2021-10-26 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.36015733808438 vs Chris Gregg (1017.8323703069) | 938 |
| 2021-10-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 938.4749651813] expected: 0.58343661497332 vs cgregg (997) | 957 |
| 2021-11-09 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.46934212927321 vs Chris Gregg (978.33002832085) | 942 |
| 2021-11-09 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 941.98105186326] expected: 0.57289894051905 vs cgregg (993) | 928 |
| 2021-11-16 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 928.31381795987] expected: 0.61134136163246 vs cgregg (1007) | 916 |
| 2021-11-16 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.35538954849745 vs Chris Gregg (1019.4370764278) | 905 |
| 2021-12-26 | Rated: 905. expected: 0.32646484093858 vs Chris Gregg (1030.8095419797) | 927 |
| 2021-12-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 926.55312508997] expected: 0.61647249386688 vs cgregg (1009) | 946 |
| 2021-12-29 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.43804534672139 vs Chris Gregg (989.27288019626) | 932 |
| 2021-12-29 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 931.98254890492] expected: 0.60080233952808 vs cgregg (1003) | 919 |
| 2022-01-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 919.20822376981] expected: 0.63579939134792 vs cgregg (1016) | 940 |
| 2022-01-15 | Rated: 940. expected: 0.42058494710381 vs Chris Gregg (995.65441947687) | 959 |
| 2022-10-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 958.54128169268] expected: 0.5265392654975 vs cgregg (977) | 975 |
| 2022-10-05 | Rated: 975. expected: 0.52135679552835 vs Chris Gregg (960.15074350408) | 990 |
| 2022-10-13 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 990.31658254309] expected: 0.43515152180382 vs cgregg (945) | 1004 |
| 2022-10-13 | Rated: 1004. expected: 0.60343279990641 vs Chris Gregg (931.07515130228) | 1017 |
| 2022-10-22 | Rated: 1017. expected: 0.63822618980932 vs Chris Gregg (918.38500089928) | 1029 |
| 2022-10-22 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1028.5767619261] expected: 0.33184502016684 vs cgregg (907) | 1039 |
| 2022-11-06 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1039.1958025714] expected: 0.30485137667707 vs cgregg (896) | 1017 |
| 2022-11-06 | Rated: 1017. expected: 0.63841257276703 vs Chris Gregg (918.24475594633) | 997 |
| 2022-11-14 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 996.57079767146] expected: 0.41789901079704 vs cgregg (939) | 1010 |
| 2022-11-14 | Rated: 1010. expected: 0.61909027483402 vs Chris Gregg (925.62723165449) | 1022 |
| 2022-11-27 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1022.1891112053] expected: 0.34784097027543 vs cgregg (913) | 1033 |
| 2022-11-27 | Rated: 1033. expected: 0.68023461430908 vs Chris Gregg (901.86908895119) | 1043 |
| 2022-12-05 | Rated: 1043. expected: 0.70501982882439 vs Chris Gregg (891.63659660908) | 1020 |
| 2022-12-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1020.4393654776] expected: 0.35144029183484 vs cgregg (914) | 1000 |
| 2022-12-19 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.59280822478629 vs Chris Gregg (934.75391066128) | 997 |
| 2022-12-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 997.03013680684] expected: 0.41585689847892 vs cgregg (938) | 978 |
| 2022-12-26 | Rated: 978. expected: 0.53062545800855 vs Chris Gregg (956.69257924867) | 961 |
| 2023-01-05 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.48177075471508 vs Chris Gregg (973.67259390495) | 946 |
| 2023-01-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 945.58333584912] expected: 0.5621583875874 vs cgregg (989) | 932 |
| 2023-01-07 | Rated: 932. expected: 0.39920666147875 vs Chris Gregg (1003.0109315972) | 951 |
| 2023-01-07 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 951.22538683268] expected: 0.54702704930419 vs cgregg (984) | 969 |
| 2023-01-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 968.73025241041] expected: 0.49607093181401 vs cgregg (966) | 985 |
| 2023-01-26 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.55002023033666 vs Chris Gregg (950.12573018195) | 999 |
| 2023-02-03 | Rated: 999. expected: 0.59006455487436 vs Chris Gregg (935.72637755272) | 980 |
| 2023-02-03 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 980.11793424402] expected: 0.46391523188715 vs cgregg (955) | 963 |
| 2023-02-19 | Rated: 963. expected: 0.48682835772375 vs Chris Gregg (972.15471257961) | 979 |
| 2023-02-19 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 979.42149255284] expected: 0.46634472877917 vs cgregg (956) | 994 |
| 2023-03-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 994.34452387377] expected: 0.42382867179272 vs cgregg (941) | 976 |
| 2023-03-05 | Rated: 976. expected: 0.52381733977148 vs Chris Gregg (959.43748250263) | 959 |
| 2023-03-18 | Rated: 959. expected: 0.47526793242736 vs Chris Gregg (976.19963737532) | 976 |
| 2023-03-18 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 975.79142616232] expected: 0.47585399202969 vs cgregg (959) | 991 |
| 2023-03-21 | Rated: 991. expected: 0.56755005244248 vs Chris Gregg (943.77267225505) | 1005 |
| 2023-03-21 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1004.8383983218] expected: 0.39393425249146 vs cgregg (930) | 1017 |
| 2023-03-25 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1017.4442944016] expected: 0.35934599528934 vs cgregg (917) | 997 |
| 2023-03-25 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.58479869202003 vs Chris Gregg (937.50092815074) | 978 |
| 2023-04-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 978.28644185536] expected: 0.62090868260686 vs jrwusmc (1064) | 998 |
| 2023-06-10 | Rated: 998. expected: 0.49712180042519 vs Tim Boord (1000) | 1014 |
| 2023-06-10 | Rated: 998. expected: 0.49712180042519 vs Tim Boord (1000) | 1014 |
| 2023-07-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1014.0921023864] expected: 0.30132974213004 vs wwillow (868) | 992 |
| 2023-07-18 | Rated: 992. expected: 0.59259225333156 vs John Barkoviak (926.90932511514) | 1005 |
| 2023-07-19 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1005.0370478934] expected: 0.42989490756805 vs cgregg (956) | 1019 |
| 2023-07-19 | Rated: 1019. expected: 0.60869897921795 vs Chris Gregg (942.24336295782) | 1032 |
| 2023-08-04 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1031.521632665] expected: 0.35791952056358 vs cgregg (930) | 1011 |
| 2023-08-05 | Rated: 1011. expected: 0.58613198746263 vs Chris Gregg (950.54657534197) | 992 |
| 2023-08-17 | Rated: 992. expected: 0.53261751039303 vs Chris Gregg (969.30279894077) | 975 |
| 2023-08-17 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 974.95623966742] expected: 0.51588789810998 vs cgregg (986) | 959 |
| 2023-08-19 | Rated: 959. expected: 0.4391527612946 vs Chris Gregg (1001.4915872605) | 977 |
| 2023-08-19 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 976.94711163857] expected: 0.51014852827621 vs cgregg (984) | 993 |
| 2023-08-22 | Rated: 993. expected: 0.53638084111706 vs Chris Gregg (967.67524709516) | 1008 |
| 2023-08-22 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1007.8358130843] expected: 0.42173372502109 vs cgregg (953) | 1021 |
| 2023-09-01 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1021.3312922849] expected: 0.38504697261333 vs cgregg (940) | 1002 |
| 2023-09-01 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.56060607855249 vs Chris Gregg (959.67849687637) | 984 |
| 2023-09-02 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.5091835596883 vs Chris Gregg (977.61789139005) | 1000 |
| 2023-09-02 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 999.70612608997] expected: 0.44594856389237 vs cgregg (962) | 1014 |
| 2023-09-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1013.9764801345] expected: 0.40617727034722 vs cgregg (948) | 1027 |
| 2023-09-10 | Rated: 1027. expected: 0.62938542217726 vs Chris Gregg (935.00232734889) | 1039 |
| 2023-09-24 | Rated: 1039. expected: 0.66081504809731 vs Chris Gregg (923.14266085856) | 1018 |
| 2023-09-24 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1017.8539184609] expected: 0.39528808825533 vs cgregg (944) | 999 |
| 2023-10-21 | Rated: 999. expected: 0.55112406202791 vs Chris Gregg (963.35078117583) | 981 |
| 2023-10-21 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 981.36403001511] expected: 0.49947611888784 vs cgregg (981) | 965 |
| 2023-10-29 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.45405415521538 vs Chris Gregg (997.01676419559) | 966 |
| 2023-11-19 | Rated: 966. expected: 0.45758138160734 vs Chris Gregg (995.54649716248) | 983 |
| 2023-11-19 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 983.35739578857] expected: 0.49229069870637 vs cgregg (978) | 999 |
| 2023-11-30 | Rated: 999. expected: 0.55269583847731 vs Chris Gregg (962.2466976414) | 981 |
| 2023-11-30 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 981.31373316873] expected: 0.49810939500387 vs cgregg (980) | 965 |
| 2024-02-03 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.44980064674646 vs J. Boord (1000) | 951 |
| 2024-02-17 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 950.60637930411] expected: 0.56495747694968 vs cgregg (996) | 969 |
| 2024-02-17 | Rated: 969. expected: 0.48716395085776 vs Chris Gregg (977.92136073761) | 985 |
| 2024-02-27 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 985.41075357255] expected: 0.63017940674073 vs jrwusmc (1078) | 974 |
| 2024-03-14 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 973.57649458825] expected: 0.6755747511645 vs jrwusmc (1101) | 995 |
| 2024-03-28 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 995.19488662552] expected: 0.45237354742001 vs cgregg (962) | 978 |
| 2024-03-28 | Rated: 978. expected: 0.49780673487265 vs Chris Gregg (979.52404648256) | 962 |
| 2024-04-01 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 962.07018448408] expected: 0.54724841829323 vs cgregg (995) | 980 |
| 2024-04-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 979.58213386946] expected: 0.49628407906773 vs cgregg (977) | 995 |
| 2024-04-11 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 995.46322439963] expected: 0.63144967149193 vs jrwusmc (1089) | 984 |
| 2024-04-20 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 983.66961388737] expected: 0.46742202199089 vs cgregg (961) | 999 |
| 2024-04-26 | Rated: 999. expected: 0.57562719694713 vs Chris Gregg (946.04249529629) | 981 |
| 2024-04-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 980.57992969769] expected: 0.47615765897622 vs cgregg (964) | 964 |
| 2024-04-28 | Rated: 964. expected: 0.47589487005824 vs Chris Gregg (980.76295491276) | 949 |
| 2024-04-28 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 948.77136415814] expected: 0.56755190058481 vs cgregg (996) | 935 |
| 2024-06-04 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.39393433377163 vs Chris Gregg (1009.8383391813) | 922 |
| 2024-06-04 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 922.39410131931] expected: 0.63954218294762 vs cgregg (1022) | 911 |
| 2024-06-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 910.85945117363] expected: 0.76716946479409 vs jrwusmc (1118) | 903 |
| 2024-06-20 | Rated: 903. expected: 0.32051243717379 vs Chris Gregg (1033.5346501457) | 925 |
| 2024-06-20 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 924.74360201044] expected: 0.62299691657527 vs cgregg (1012) | 945 |
| 2024-07-17 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 944.67950334085] expected: 0.65363497018055 vs jrwusmc (1055) | 934 |
| 2024-08-12 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 933.59582238662] expected: 0.5120922254483 vs wwillow (942) | 950 |
| 2024-08-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 949.98277360097] expected: 0.67632337767836 vs jrwusmc (1078) | 972 |
| 2024-08-26 | Rated: 972. expected: 0.47115749668175 vs Chris Gregg (992.06409866959) | 989 |
| 2024-08-31 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.51993393345119 vs Chris Gregg (975.14113856341) | 972 |
| 2024-10-01 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 972.36211412956] expected: 0.52823113186184 vs cgregg (992) | 957 |
| 2024-10-19 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 957.26551034914] expected: 0.57108878199334 vs cgregg (1007) | 944 |
| 2024-10-31 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 943.54035137293] expected: 0.61512796845769 vs jrwusmc (1025) | 963 |
| 2024-11-08 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 963.22444636357] expected: 0.58238768403566 vs cgregg (1021) | 950 |
| 2024-11-12 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 949.86085225272] expected: 0.61877309003422 vs cgregg (1034) | 970 |
| 2024-11-20 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 969.66159113381] expected: 0.56346395064484 vs cgregg (1014) | 956 |
| 2024-11-25 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 955.69243755445] expected: 0.60258215717137 vs cgregg (1028) | 943 |
| 2024-12-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 942.97506658393] expected: 0.62807833386186 vs jrwusmc (1034) | 963 |
| 2024-12-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 963.07357326751] expected: 0.6103016991211 vs cgregg (1041) | 951 |
| 2025-02-24 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 950.60322763938] expected: 0.68181753835621 vs jrwusmc (1083) | 940 |
| 2025-06-25 | Rated: 940. expected: 0.53753009447563 vs John Barkoviak (913.87227722175) | 923 |
| 2025-07-13 | Rated: 923. expected: 0.48838376397272 vs John Barkoviak (931.07324024497) | 939 |
| 2025-08-01 | Rated: 939. expected: 0.53491142238006 vs John Barkoviak (914.7015206921) | 922 |
| 2025-08-02 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 921.88283448384] expected: 0.74704039587055 vs jrwusmc (1110) | 914 |
Games logged: 99 Played Won Lost
Games won: 94
Attacking Win: 47.42% (97 attempts)
Defending Win: 48.98% (98 attempts)
Opponent filter:
Publication reviews: |
| Publication | Headline | Score | Date |
View Uploaded Files?
To-Play List:
Seek list:
| Publications Wanted:
|
Games Played |
| Grey rows indicate games logged by your opponent. |
Worst losing streak: 8 games lost (From 2020-12-20 to 2021-01-09 [20 days])