| Date | Calculations | New Rating |
|---|
| 1990-08-22 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.5 vs Scott Waites (1000) | 1000 |
| 1990-08-22 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.5 vs Scott Waites (1000) | 1000 |
| 1991-02-15 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.5 vs Scott Waites (1000) | 968 |
| 1991-02-15 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.5 vs Scott Waites (1000) | 968 |
| 1991-02-23 | Rated: 968. expected: 0.40892440368506 vs Scott Waites (1032) | 942 |
| 1991-02-23 | Rated: 968. expected: 0.40892440368506 vs Scott Waites (1032) | 942 |
| 1991-03-02 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.33878016143539 vs Scott Waites (1058.1711618358) | 920 |
| 1991-03-02 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.33878016143539 vs Scott Waites (1058.1711618358) | 920 |
| 1991-03-06 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.2849195146292 vs Scott Waites (1079.8530921677) | 902 |
| 1991-03-06 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.2849195146292 vs Scott Waites (1079.8530921677) | 902 |
| 1991-03-08 | Rated: 902. expected: 0.24438762428762 vs Scott Waites (1098.087941104) | 886 |
| 1991-03-08 | Rated: 902. expected: 0.24438762428762 vs Scott Waites (1098.087941104) | 886 |
| 1991-03-16 | Rated: 886. expected: 0.21233426399318 vs Scott Waites (1113.7287490584) | 936 |
| 1991-03-16 | Rated: 886. expected: 0.21233426399318 vs Scott Waites (1113.7287490584) | 936 |
| 1991-04-13 | Rated: 936. expected: 0.3245581962836 vs Scott Waites (1063.3181419539) | 947 |
| 1991-04-13 | Rated: 936. expected: 0.3245581962836 vs Scott Waites (1063.3181419539) | 947 |
| 1991-04-17 | Rated: 947. expected: 0.35321296664488 vs Scott Waites (1052.0898665161) | 988 |
| 1991-04-17 | Rated: 947. expected: 0.35321296664488 vs Scott Waites (1052.0898665161) | 988 |
| 1991-04-24 | Rated: 988. expected: 0.46738493239642 vs Scott Waites (1010.6954963814) | 958 |
| 1991-04-24 | Rated: 988. expected: 0.46738493239642 vs Scott Waites (1010.6954963814) | 958 |
| 1991-05-01 | Rated: 958. expected: 0.38330805496363 vs Scott Waites (1040.6081320547) | 997 |
| 1991-05-01 | Rated: 958. expected: 0.38330805496363 vs Scott Waites (1040.6081320547) | 997 |
| 1991-05-04 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.49404256237122 vs Scott Waites (1001.1398475724) | 997 |
| 1991-05-04 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.49404256237122 vs Scott Waites (1001.1398475724) | 997 |
| 1991-06-12 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.49459119171176 vs Scott Waites (1000.7585715642) | 965 |
| 1991-06-12 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.49459119171176 vs Scott Waites (1000.7585715642) | 965 |
| 1991-06-19 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.40418512254208 vs Scott Waites (1032.4124078337) | 971 |
| 1991-06-19 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.40418512254208 vs Scott Waites (1032.4124078337) | 971 |
| 1991-07-08 | Rated: 971. expected: 0.42110991783207 vs Scott Waites (1026.2802556764) | 1008 |
| 1991-07-08 | Rated: 971. expected: 0.42110991783207 vs Scott Waites (1026.2802556764) | 1008 |
| 1991-12-03 | Rated: 1008. expected: 0.52698410076981 vs Scott Waites (989.23129041767) | 1038 |
| 1991-12-03 | Rated: 1008. expected: 0.52698410076981 vs Scott Waites (989.23129041767) | 1038 |
| 1992-01-01 | Rated: 1038. expected: 0.61182754867894 vs Scott Waites (958.95827286694) | 999 |
| 1992-01-01 | Rated: 1038. expected: 0.61182754867894 vs Scott Waites (958.95827286694) | 999 |
| 1992-02-02 | Rated: 999. expected: 0.50127327502123 vs Scott Waites (998.11523598239) | 967 |
| 1992-02-02 | Rated: 999. expected: 0.50127327502123 vs Scott Waites (998.11523598239) | 967 |
| 1992-02-05 | Rated: 967. expected: 0.41004252223281 vs Scott Waites (1030.1967255837) | 941 |
| 1992-02-05 | Rated: 967. expected: 0.41004252223281 vs Scott Waites (1030.1967255837) | 941 |
| 1992-02-19 | Rated: 941. expected: 0.33972434356193 vs Scott Waites (1056.4394470066) | 919 |
| 1992-02-19 | Rated: 941. expected: 0.33972434356193 vs Scott Waites (1056.4394470066) | 919 |
| 1992-02-26 | Rated: 919. expected: 0.28570747019836 vs Scott Waites (1078.1818049946) | 901 |
| 1992-02-26 | Rated: 919. expected: 0.28570747019836 vs Scott Waites (1078.1818049946) | 901 |
| 1992-03-04 | Rated: 901. expected: 0.24504820019295 vs Scott Waites (1096.4670830873) | 885 |
| 1992-03-04 | Rated: 901. expected: 0.24504820019295 vs Scott Waites (1096.4670830873) | 885 |
| 1992-04-11 | Rated: 885. expected: 0.21289183208434 vs Scott Waites (1112.1501678997) | 871 |
| 1992-04-11 | Rated: 885. expected: 0.21289183208434 vs Scott Waites (1112.1501678997) | 871 |
| 1992-04-29 | Rated: 871. expected: 0.18745930703593 vs Scott Waites (1125.7752451531) | 859 |
| 1992-04-29 | Rated: 871. expected: 0.18745930703593 vs Scott Waites (1125.7752451531) | 859 |
| 1992-05-05 | Rated: 859. expected: 0.16731957513247 vs Scott Waites (1137.7726408034) | 848 |
| 1992-05-05 | Rated: 859. expected: 0.16731957513247 vs Scott Waites (1137.7726408034) | 848 |
| 1992-05-09 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.1506249057702 vs Scott Waites (1148.4810936118) | 902 |
| 1992-05-09 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.1506249057702 vs Scott Waites (1148.4810936118) | 902 |
| 1992-08-30 | Rated: 902. expected: 0.24862896851368 vs Scott Waites (1094.1210875811) | 918 |
| 1992-08-30 | Rated: 902. expected: 0.24862896851368 vs Scott Waites (1094.1210875811) | 918 |
| 1992-12-12 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.28470816100728 vs Scott Waites (1078.033341566) | 900 |
| 1992-12-12 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.28470816100728 vs Scott Waites (1078.033341566) | 900 |
| 1992-12-19 | Rated: 900. expected: 0.24421044117935 vs Scott Waites (1096.2546638705) | 948 |
| 1992-12-19 | Rated: 900. expected: 0.24421044117935 vs Scott Waites (1096.2546638705) | 948 |
| 1992-12-22 | Rated: 948. expected: 0.36008867672109 vs Scott Waites (1047.8841321059) | 925 |
| 1992-12-22 | Rated: 948. expected: 0.36008867672109 vs Scott Waites (1047.8841321059) | 925 |
| 1992-12-30 | Rated: 925. expected: 0.39371217621457 vs Michael Vreeland (1000) | 964 |
| 1992-12-30 | Rated: 925. expected: 0.39371217621457 vs Michael Vreeland (1000) | 964 |
| 1993-01-01 | Rated: 964. expected: 0.35079706757894 vs Scott Waites (1070.9298074161) | 974 |
| 1993-01-01 | Rated: 964. expected: 0.35079706757894 vs Scott Waites (1070.9298074161) | 974 |
| 1993-03-21 | Rated: 974. expected: 0.37683487624388 vs Scott Waites (1061.3808197411) | 950 |
| 1993-03-21 | Rated: 974. expected: 0.37683487624388 vs Scott Waites (1061.3808197411) | 950 |
| 1993-03-28 | Rated: 950. expected: 0.31432190402271 vs Scott Waites (1085.4982518208) | 930 |
| 1993-03-28 | Rated: 950. expected: 0.31432190402271 vs Scott Waites (1085.4982518208) | 930 |
| 1993-07-24 | Rated: 930. expected: 0.26679977336802 vs Scott Waites (1105.6148536782) | 977 |
| 1993-07-24 | Rated: 930. expected: 0.26679977336802 vs Scott Waites (1105.6148536782) | 977 |
| 1993-11-06 | Rated: 977. expected: 0.38455809938158 vs Scott Waites (1058.6900391738) | 952 |
| 1993-11-06 | Rated: 977. expected: 0.38455809938158 vs Scott Waites (1058.6900391738) | 952 |
| 1994-02-02 | Rated: 952. expected: 0.31955150335696 vs Scott Waites (1083.3017575342) | 932 |
| 1994-02-02 | Rated: 952. expected: 0.31955150335696 vs Scott Waites (1083.3017575342) | 932 |
| 1994-05-30 | Rated: 932. expected: 0.27117089432337 vs Scott Waites (1103.753053749) | 979 |
| 1994-05-30 | Rated: 932. expected: 0.27117089432337 vs Scott Waites (1103.753053749) | 979 |
| 1994-09-17 | Rated: 979. expected: 0.38944975358865 vs Scott Waites (1057.1079909857) | 954 |
| 1994-09-17 | Rated: 979. expected: 0.38944975358865 vs Scott Waites (1057.1079909857) | 954 |
| 1994-10-08 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.32365702882664 vs Scott Waites (1082.0327752154) | 997 |
| 1994-10-08 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.32365702882664 vs Scott Waites (1082.0327752154) | 997 |
| 1994-12-18 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.44020896130806 vs Scott Waites (1038.7468250603) | 969 |
| 1994-12-18 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.44020896130806 vs Scott Waites (1038.7468250603) | 969 |
| 1995-01-07 | Rated: 969. expected: 0.36269779995834 vs Scott Waites (1066.920198584) | 946 |
| 1995-01-07 | Rated: 969. expected: 0.36269779995834 vs Scott Waites (1066.920198584) | 946 |
| 1995-01-15 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.30370947494806 vs Scott Waites (1090.1328577814) | 991 |
| 1995-01-15 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.30370947494806 vs Scott Waites (1090.1328577814) | 991 |
| 1995-04-01 | Rated: 991. expected: 0.42210656140582 vs Scott Waites (1045.570264178) | 1028 |
| 1995-04-01 | Rated: 991. expected: 0.42210656140582 vs Scott Waites (1045.570264178) | 1028 |
| 1995-04-08 | Rated: 1028. expected: 0.52791126368249 vs Scott Waites (1008.585084108) | 1058 |
| 1995-04-08 | Rated: 1028. expected: 0.52791126368249 vs Scott Waites (1008.585084108) | 1058 |
| 1995-05-06 | Rated: 1058. expected: 0.61262956891594 vs Scott Waites (978.37140498368) | 1083 |
| 1995-05-06 | Rated: 1058. expected: 0.61262956891594 vs Scott Waites (978.37140498368) | 1083 |
| 1995-05-13 | Rated: 1083. expected: 0.67808893688062 vs Scott Waites (953.5796973943) | 1104 |
| 1995-05-13 | Rated: 1083. expected: 0.67808893688062 vs Scott Waites (953.5796973943) | 1104 |
| 1995-08-19 | Rated: 1104. expected: 0.7279972877053 vs Scott Waites (932.97738935466) | 1089 |
| 1995-08-19 | Rated: 1104. expected: 0.7279972877053 vs Scott Waites (932.97738935466) | 1089 |
| 1995-12-10 | Rated: 1089. expected: 0.69299123183523 vs Scott Waites (947.5692157678) | 1109 |
| 1995-12-10 | Rated: 1089. expected: 0.69299123183523 vs Scott Waites (947.5692157678) | 1109 |
| 1996-02-24 | Rated: 1109. expected: 0.73930829366359 vs Scott Waites (927.92065460525) | 1126 |
| 1996-02-24 | Rated: 1109. expected: 0.73930829366359 vs Scott Waites (927.92065460525) | 1126 |
| 1996-06-15 | Rated: 1126. expected: 0.77491561160288 vs Scott Waites (911.23638539972) | 1076 |
| 1996-06-15 | Rated: 1126. expected: 0.77491561160288 vs Scott Waites (911.23638539972) | 1076 |
| 1996-12-26 | Rated: 1076. expected: 0.65992637678128 vs Scott Waites (960.83098454231) | 1034 |
| 1996-12-26 | Rated: 1076. expected: 0.65992637678128 vs Scott Waites (960.83098454231) | 1034 |
| 1997-03-15 | Rated: 1034. expected: 0.54439995273232 vs Scott Waites (1003.0662726563) | 1063 |
| 1997-03-15 | Rated: 1034. expected: 0.54439995273232 vs Scott Waites (1003.0662726563) | 1063 |
| 2010-03-05 | Rated: 1063. expected: 0.62547563800699 vs Scott Waites (973.90786963118) | 1023 |
| 2010-03-05 | Rated: 1063. expected: 0.62547563800699 vs Scott Waites (973.90786963118) | 1023 |
| 2010-03-10 | Rated: 1023. expected: 0.51303786331769 vs Scott Waites (1013.9383104636) | 1054 |
| 2010-03-10 | Rated: 1023. expected: 0.51303786331769 vs Scott Waites (1013.9383104636) | 1054 |
| 2010-03-12 | Rated: 1054. expected: 0.60109198003586 vs Scott Waites (982.77273371596) | 1016 |
| 2010-03-12 | Rated: 1054. expected: 0.60109198003586 vs Scott Waites (982.77273371596) | 1016 |
| 2010-03-17 | Rated: 1016. expected: 0.49245583528057 vs Scott Waites (1021.2426204383) | 984 |
| 2010-03-17 | Rated: 1016. expected: 0.49245583528057 vs Scott Waites (1021.2426204383) | 984 |
| 2010-03-31 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.40231868006251 vs Scott Waites (1052.7597938962) | 1022 |
| 2010-03-31 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.40231868006251 vs Scott Waites (1052.7597938962) | 1022 |
| 2010-04-07 | Rated: 1022. expected: 0.5107799113735 vs Scott Waites (1014.5081894202) | 1053 |
| 2010-04-07 | Rated: 1022. expected: 0.5107799113735 vs Scott Waites (1014.5081894202) | 1053 |
| 2010-04-21 | Rated: 1053. expected: 0.59912293809387 vs Scott Waites (983.19810374811) | 1015 |
| 2010-04-21 | Rated: 1053. expected: 0.59912293809387 vs Scott Waites (983.19810374811) | 1015 |
| 2010-04-28 | Rated: 1015. expected: 0.49058645827908 vs Scott Waites (1021.5419717861) | 984 |
| 2010-04-28 | Rated: 1015. expected: 0.49058645827908 vs Scott Waites (1021.5419717861) | 984 |
| 2010-05-12 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.40206995082014 vs Scott Waites (1052.939505116) | 1022 |
| 2010-05-12 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.40206995082014 vs Scott Waites (1052.939505116) | 1022 |
| 2010-05-26 | Rated: 1022. expected: 0.51054430213835 vs Scott Waites (1014.6719819685) | 989 |
| 2010-05-26 | Rated: 1022. expected: 0.51054430213835 vs Scott Waites (1014.6719819685) | 989 |
| 2010-06-09 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.41681273997439 vs Scott Waites (1047.3468173053) | 1026 |
| 2010-06-09 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.41681273997439 vs Scott Waites (1047.3468173053) | 1026 |
| 2010-06-23 | Rated: 1026. expected: 0.52297679794134 vs Scott Waites (1010.0228326637) | 1057 |
| 2010-06-23 | Rated: 1026. expected: 0.52297679794134 vs Scott Waites (1010.0228326637) | 1057 |
| 2010-06-30 | Rated: 1057. expected: 0.60972684140713 vs Scott Waites (979.49334773193) | 1018 |
| 2010-06-30 | Rated: 1057. expected: 0.60972684140713 vs Scott Waites (979.49334773193) | 1018 |
| 2010-07-14 | Rated: 1018. expected: 0.49925761029613 vs Scott Waites (1018.515865582) | 986 |
| 2010-07-14 | Rated: 1018. expected: 0.49925761029613 vs Scott Waites (1018.515865582) | 986 |
| 2010-07-21 | Rated: 986. expected: 0.40827291355553 vs Scott Waites (1050.4683526409) | 960 |
| 2010-07-21 | Rated: 986. expected: 0.40827291355553 vs Scott Waites (1050.4683526409) | 960 |
| 2010-09-18 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.33823020720404 vs Scott Waites (1076.5978191085) | 1002 |
| 2010-09-18 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.33823020720404 vs Scott Waites (1076.5978191085) | 1002 |
| 2010-09-22 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.45372912939466 vs Scott Waites (1034.2445523696) | 973 |
| 2010-09-22 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.45372912939466 vs Scott Waites (1034.2445523696) | 973 |
| 2010-10-13 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.37291958672809 vs Scott Waites (1063.2832166508) | 1013 |
| 2010-10-13 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.37291958672809 vs Scott Waites (1063.2832166508) | 1013 |
| 2010-10-20 | Rated: 1013. expected: 0.48539702896306 vs Scott Waites (1023.1500702014) | 982 |
| 2010-10-20 | Rated: 1013. expected: 0.48539702896306 vs Scott Waites (1023.1500702014) | 982 |
| 2010-11-10 | Rated: 982. expected: 0.39754478897379 vs Scott Waites (1054.215480055) | 957 |
| 2010-11-10 | Rated: 982. expected: 0.39754478897379 vs Scott Waites (1054.215480055) | 957 |
| 2010-11-17 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.33046599285386 vs Scott Waites (1079.6583465494) | 1000 |
| 2010-11-17 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.33046599285386 vs Scott Waites (1079.6583465494) | 1000 |
| 2010-12-01 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.4472260788593 vs Scott Waites (1036.808170092) | 1035 |
| 2010-12-01 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.4472260788593 vs Scott Waites (1036.808170092) | 1035 |
| 2010-12-08 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54816041968949 vs Scott Waites (1001.430639139) | 1000 |
| 2010-12-08 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54816041968949 vs Scott Waites (1001.430639139) | 1000 |
| 2010-12-15 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.44764630189109 vs Scott Waites (1036.5129059991) | 1035 |
| 2010-12-15 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.44764630189109 vs Scott Waites (1036.5129059991) | 1035 |
| 2011-01-05 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54854302317195 vs Scott Waites (1001.1622693202) | 1000 |
| 2011-01-05 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54854302317195 vs Scott Waites (1001.1622693202) | 1000 |
| 2011-01-19 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.44799345550634 vs Scott Waites (1036.2690228032) | 1035 |
| 2011-01-19 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.44799345550634 vs Scott Waites (1036.2690228032) | 1035 |
| 2011-02-16 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54885899884147 vs Scott Waites (1000.9406039556) | 1000 |
| 2011-02-16 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54885899884147 vs Scott Waites (1000.9406039556) | 1000 |
| 2011-03-03 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.44828023609281 vs Scott Waites (1036.0675798814) | 1035 |
| 2011-03-03 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.44828023609281 vs Scott Waites (1036.0675798814) | 1035 |
| 2011-03-23 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54911995560034 vs Scott Waites (1000.7575149914) | 1000 |
| 2011-03-23 | Rated: 1035. expected: 0.54911995560034 vs Scott Waites (1000.7575149914) | 1000 |
| 2011-04-06 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.4485171369397 vs Scott Waites (1035.9011921498) | 971 |
| 2011-04-06 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.4485171369397 vs Scott Waites (1035.9011921498) | 971 |
| 2011-06-01 | Rated: 971. expected: 0.3684572099197 vs Scott Waites (1064.6062889139) | 947 |
| 2011-06-01 | Rated: 971. expected: 0.3684572099197 vs Scott Waites (1064.6062889139) | 947 |
| 2011-06-08 | Rated: 947. expected: 0.30730674025655 vs Scott Waites (1088.1875503488) | 927 |
| 2011-06-08 | Rated: 947. expected: 0.30730674025655 vs Scott Waites (1088.1875503488) | 927 |
| 2011-07-13 | Rated: 927. expected: 0.26094048194001 vs Scott Waites (1107.8551817252) | 910 |
| 2011-07-13 | Rated: 927. expected: 0.26094048194001 vs Scott Waites (1107.8551817252) | 910 |
| 2011-08-04 | Rated: 910. expected: 0.22529354277832 vs Scott Waites (1124.5553725694) | 960 |
| 2011-08-04 | Rated: 910. expected: 0.22529354277832 vs Scott Waites (1124.5553725694) | 960 |
| 2011-08-25 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.34032540025649 vs Scott Waites (1074.9741593072) | 938 |
| 2011-08-25 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.34032540025649 vs Scott Waites (1074.9741593072) | 938 |
| 2011-09-15 | Rated: 938. expected: 0.28620915014036 vs Scott Waites (1096.7549849236) | 984 |
| 2011-09-15 | Rated: 938. expected: 0.28620915014036 vs Scott Waites (1096.7549849236) | 984 |
| 2011-10-19 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.4046565938253 vs Scott Waites (1051.0723705326) | 1022 |
| 2011-10-19 | Rated: 984. expected: 0.4046565938253 vs Scott Waites (1051.0723705326) | 1022 |
| 2011-11-16 | Rated: 1022. expected: 0.51299172478407 vs Scott Waites (1012.9703925374) | 1053 |
| 2011-11-16 | Rated: 1022. expected: 0.51299172478407 vs Scott Waites (1012.9703925374) | 1053 |
| 2011-12-21 | Rated: 1053. expected: 0.60105177268768 vs Scott Waites (981.80186292358) | 1015 |
| 2011-12-21 | Rated: 1053. expected: 0.60105177268768 vs Scott Waites (981.80186292358) | 1015 |
| 2012-01-04 | Rated: 1015. expected: 0.4924176269592 vs Scott Waites (1020.2691763756) | 1047 |
| 2012-01-04 | Rated: 1015. expected: 0.4924176269592 vs Scott Waites (1020.2691763756) | 1047 |
| 2012-01-20 | Rated: 1047. expected: 0.58440311519359 vs Scott Waites (987.78390450098) | 1074 |
| 2012-01-20 | Rated: 1047. expected: 0.58440311519359 vs Scott Waites (987.78390450098) | 1074 |
| 2012-02-08 | Rated: 1074. expected: 0.6568777862635 vs Scott Waites (961.18570387337) | 1096 |
| 2012-02-08 | Rated: 1074. expected: 0.6568777862635 vs Scott Waites (961.18570387337) | 1096 |
| 2012-02-15 | Rated: 1096. expected: 0.71145566732257 vs Scott Waites (939.22588219424) | 1114 |
| 2012-02-15 | Rated: 1096. expected: 0.71145566732257 vs Scott Waites (939.22588219424) | 1114 |
| 2012-03-23 | Rated: 1114. expected: 0.75257336189836 vs Scott Waites (920.75904490288) | 1066 |
| 2012-03-23 | Rated: 1114. expected: 0.75257336189836 vs Scott Waites (920.75904490288) | 1066 |
| 2012-05-02 | Rated: 1066. expected: 0.63617851178854 vs Scott Waites (968.92374006438) | 1025 |
| 2012-05-02 | Rated: 1066. expected: 0.63617851178854 vs Scott Waites (968.92374006438) | 1025 |
| 2012-06-13 | Rated: 1025. expected: 0.52209162649156 vs Scott Waites (1009.6391648188) | 1056 |
| 2012-06-13 | Rated: 1025. expected: 0.52209162649156 vs Scott Waites (1009.6391648188) | 1056 |
| 2012-07-07 | Rated: 1056. expected: 0.60895991519505 vs Scott Waites (979.0530289143) | 1081 |
| 2012-07-07 | Rated: 1056. expected: 0.60895991519505 vs Scott Waites (979.0530289143) | 1081 |
| 2012-07-18 | Rated: 1081. expected: 0.6750067835664 vs Scott Waites (954.02646348679) | 1038 |
| 2012-07-18 | Rated: 1081. expected: 0.6750067835664 vs Scott Waites (954.02646348679) | 1038 |
| 2012-09-05 | Rated: 1038. expected: 0.5584093180436 vs Scott Waites (997.22689763504) | 1002 |
| 2012-09-05 | Rated: 1038. expected: 0.5584093180436 vs Scott Waites (997.22689763504) | 1002 |
| 2012-10-03 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.45555526334428 vs Scott Waites (1032.9650939898) | 973 |
| 2012-10-03 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.45555526334428 vs Scott Waites (1032.9650939898) | 973 |
| 2013-01-09 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.37448593031681 vs Scott Waites (1062.1206308439) | 949 |
| 2013-01-09 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.37448593031681 vs Scott Waites (1062.1206308439) | 949 |
| 2013-02-20 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.31235326962973 vs Scott Waites (1086.0877303841) | 993 |
| 2013-02-20 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.31235326962973 vs Scott Waites (1086.0877303841) | 993 |
| 2013-04-17 | Rated: 993. expected: 0.42983665314067 vs Scott Waites (1042.0783396404) | 965 |
| 2013-04-17 | Rated: 993. expected: 0.42983665314067 vs Scott Waites (1042.0783396404) | 965 |
| 2013-06-20 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.69266437245279 vs Dan Best (823.83602329465) | 985 |
| 2013-06-20 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.49474925538024 vs Mike Bistodeau (988.64872519542) | 953 |
| 2013-06-20 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.49474925538024 vs Mike Bistodeau (988.64872519542) | 953 |
| 2013-06-21 | Rated: 953. expected: 0.72471331109539 vs Dan Best (784.84758958432) | 971 |
| 2013-06-21 | Rated: 971. expected: 0.49711252904573 vs Roy Connelly (973.00644262847) | 1003 |
| 2013-06-22 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.48733545258036 vs Matt Shostak (1011.8021115882) | 972 |
| 2013-06-22 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.48733545258036 vs Matt Shostak (1011.8021115882) | 972 |
| 2013-06-22 | Rated: 972. expected: 0.45979177167625 vs David Longstreet (1000) | 943 |
| 2013-06-23 | Rated: 943. expected: 0.41869852163109 vs Philip Johnson (1000) | 916 |
| 2013-06-23 | Rated: 943. expected: 0.41869852163109 vs Philip Johnson (1000) | 916 |
| 2013-07-10 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.29232413383635 vs Scott Waites (1069.5878854414) | 897 |
| 2013-07-10 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.29232413383635 vs Scott Waites (1069.5878854414) | 897 |
| 2013-08-07 | Rated: 897. expected: 0.24951663084359 vs Scott Waites (1088.296630007) | 945 |
| 2013-08-07 | Rated: 897. expected: 0.24951663084359 vs Scott Waites (1088.296630007) | 945 |
| 2013-09-07 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.37879719448426 vs Christopher Brackney (1030.9306618624) | 921 |
| 2013-09-20 | Rated: 921. expected: 0.35741918155506 vs Christopher Brackney (1022.899960546) | 898 |
| 2013-09-27 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 898.12517238048] expected: 0.66341322094041 vs Chris Brackney (1016) | 877 |
| 2013-10-04 | Rated: 877. expected: 0.2464554698424 vs Christopher Brackney (1071.1481841497) | 861 |
| 2013-10-11 | Rated: 861. expected: 0.28584157645146 vs Christopher Brackney (1020.0676658823) | 843 |
| 2013-11-20 | Rated: 843. expected: 0.2431378411505 vs Scott Waites (1040.265694381) | 827 |
| 2013-11-20 | Rated: 843. expected: 0.2431378411505 vs Scott Waites (1040.265694381) | 827 |
| 2013-12-04 | Rated: 827. expected: 0.21127929969042 vs Scott Waites (1055.8265162146) | 813 |
| 2013-12-04 | Rated: 827. expected: 0.21127929969042 vs Scott Waites (1055.8265162146) | 813 |
| 2014-01-08 | Rated: 813. expected: 0.18608385161907 vs Scott Waites (1069.3483913948) | 801 |
| 2014-01-08 | Rated: 813. expected: 0.18608385161907 vs Scott Waites (1069.3483913948) | 801 |
| 2014-01-10 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 801.09063349638] expected: 0.79637010684218 vs Chris Brackney (1038) | 788 |
| 2014-01-17 | Rated: 788. expected: 0.21972526084728 vs Christopher Brackney (1008.1470233783) | 838 |
| 2014-01-31 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 837.93758330577] expected: 0.66621932716399 vs Chris Brackney (958) | 881 |
| 2014-02-07 | Rated: 881. expected: 0.45070976685239 vs Christopher Brackney (915.3619630615) | 852 |
| 2014-02-21 | Rated: 852. expected: 0.31922400750977 vs Christopher Brackney (983.56347463948) | 832 |
| 2014-02-22 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 831.56966351937] expected: 0.72959895662552 vs Chris Brackney (1004) | 814 |
| 2014-02-26 | Rated: 814. expected: 0.17675935545745 vs Scott Waites (1081.2577578984) | 867 |
| 2014-02-26 | Rated: 814. expected: 0.17675935545745 vs Scott Waites (1081.2577578984) | 867 |
| 2014-02-28 | Rated: 867. expected: 0.29147010252717 vs Christopher Brackney (1021.305666776) | 848 |
| 2014-08-13 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.26125680070598 vs Scott Waites (1028.5703566477) | 895 |
| 2014-08-13 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.26125680070598 vs Scott Waites (1028.5703566477) | 895 |
| 2014-09-05 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 895.27956475482] expected: 0.69456841686048 vs Chris Brackney (1038) | 876 |
| 2014-09-12 | Rated: 876. expected: 0.3127574153679 vs Christopher Brackney (1012.7609788136) | 856 |
| 2014-10-01 | Rated: 856. expected: 0.32712179553574 vs Scott Waites (981.29079189286) | 899 |
| 2014-10-01 | Rated: 856. expected: 0.32712179553574 vs Scott Waites (981.29079189286) | 899 |
| 2014-10-03 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 899.06420508571] expected: 0.71400343648819 vs Chris Brackney (1058) | 881 |
| 2014-10-10 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 880.76042502096] expected: 0.75470943570762 vs Chris Brackney (1076) | 865 |
| 2014-10-17 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 865.06182890624] expected: 0.78690360327315 vs Chris Brackney (1092) | 851 |
| 2014-10-17 | Rated: 851. expected: 0.18757952672222 vs Christopher Brackney (1105.6381693905) | 839 |
| 2014-10-24 | Rated: 839. expected: 0.16742336650803 vs Christopher Brackney (1117.6432591007) | 828 |
| 2014-10-24 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 828.28490454349] expected: 0.84881009403905 vs Chris Brackney (1128) | 819 |
| 2014-11-07 | Rated: 819. expected: 0.17169291637467 vs Christopher Brackney (1092.3755991271) | 808 |
| 2014-11-14 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 808.01165335202] expected: 0.8452850379438 vs Chris Brackney (1103) | 798 |
| 2014-11-21 | Rated: 798. expected: 0.12432147505305 vs Christopher Brackney (1137.1194179706) | 790 |
| 2014-12-05 | Rated: 790. expected: 0.1146619091947 vs Christopher Brackney (1145.075992374) | 847 |
| 2014-12-12 | Rated: 847. expected: 0.19945681446615 vs Christopher Brackney (1088.4143545624) | 898 |
| 2014-12-19 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 898.23476387417] expected: 0.68971706977794 vs Chris Brackney (1037) | 878 |
| 2014-12-19 | Rated: 878. expected: 0.26316359303976 vs Christopher Brackney (1056.8581075342) | 861 |
| 2015-01-09 | Rated: 861. expected: 0.22716254190018 vs Christopher Brackney (1073.7005774888) | 846 |
| 2015-01-16 | Rated: 846. expected: 0.19869993591787 vs Christopher Brackney (1088.2389801704) | 833 |
| 2015-01-21 | Rated: 833. expected: 0.35303318869514 vs Scott Waites (938.22658680715) | 874 |
| 2015-01-21 | Rated: 833. expected: 0.35303318869514 vs Scott Waites (938.22658680715) | 874 |
| 2015-03-13 | Rated: 874. expected: 0.22462150696555 vs Robert Zinselmeyer (1089.2249656347) | 924 |
| 2015-03-13 | Rated: 924. expected: 0.37146340944345 vs Rick Salisbury (1015.365809948) | 900 |
| 2015-03-14 | Rated: 900. expected: 0.30982209264953 vs Rick Salisbury (1039.1394681524) | 880 |
| 2015-03-14 | Rated: 880. expected: 0.33386057541688 vs Steve Landreth (1000) | 923 |
| 2015-03-14 | Rated: 880. expected: 0.33386057541688 vs Steve Landreth (1000) | 923 |
| 2015-04-17 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 922.63292317332] expected: 0.73628793835146 vs Chris Brackney (1101) | 906 |
| 2015-05-01 | Rated: 906. expected: 0.22799534869034 vs Christopher Brackney (1117.8775719455) | 891 |
| 2015-05-01 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 891.40829768382] expected: 0.79978596329071 vs Chris Brackney (1132) | 879 |
| 2015-05-08 | Rated: 879. expected: 0.17797223039838 vs Christopher Brackney (1144.8136983494) | 868 |
| 2015-05-30 | Rated: 868. expected: 0.15989156163167 vs Christopher Brackney (1156.2039210949) | 858 |
| 2015-05-30 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 857.76694005557] expected: 0.85499558593506 vs Chris Brackney (1166) | 848 |
| 2015-06-05 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 848.48665755542] expected: 0.86756079584188 vs Chris Brackney (1175) | 840 |
| 2015-06-05 | Rated: 840. expected: 0.12161684333589 vs Christopher Brackney (1183.4761090661) | 832 |
| 2015-06-25 | Rated: 832. expected: 0.29419931930054 vs Jim Ferrell (984.01616372931) | 813 |
| 2015-07-03 | Rated: 813. expected: 0.38165941228975 vs Scott Waites (896.82071088364) | 853 |
| 2015-07-03 | Rated: 813. expected: 0.38165941228975 vs Scott Waites (896.82071088364) | 853 |
| 2015-07-31 | Rated: 853. expected: 0.49388850489081 vs Scott Waites (857.24691327018) | 885 |
| 2015-07-31 | Rated: 853. expected: 0.49388850489081 vs Scott Waites (857.24691327018) | 885 |
| 2015-08-28 | Rated: 885. expected: 0.58570014823928 vs Scott Waites (824.85577758319) | 848 |
| 2015-08-28 | Rated: 885. expected: 0.58570014823928 vs Scott Waites (824.85577758319) | 848 |
| 2015-09-18 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.47937394823435 vs Scott Waites (862.34058707051) | 881 |
| 2015-09-18 | Rated: 848. expected: 0.47937394823435 vs Scott Waites (862.34058707051) | 881 |
| 2015-09-20 | Rated: 881. expected: 0.33514202144524 vs Connor Mullins (1000) | 860 |
| 2015-09-20 | Rated: 881. expected: 0.33514202144524 vs Connor Mullins (1000) | 860 |
| 2015-10-22 | Rated: 860. expected: 0.54446527647672 vs Scott Waites (829.0205197575) | 857 |
| 2015-10-22 | Rated: 860. expected: 0.54446527647672 vs Scott Waites (829.0205197575) | 857 |
| 2015-10-23 | Rated: 857. expected: 0.19914825074054 vs Christopher Brackney (1098.7502529897) | 876 |
| 2015-11-04 | Rated: 876. expected: 0.26982220191368 vs Scott Holst (1048.9403766027) | 923 |
| 2015-11-09 | Rated: 923. expected: 0.38794379578751 vs Scott Holst (1002.2089975252) | 898 |
| 2015-11-23 | Rated: 898. expected: 0.32239238587874 vs Scott Holst (1027.0374004556) | 877 |
| 2015-12-14 | Rated: 877. expected: 0.25744395763898 vs Scott Holst (1061.0186133054) | 893 |
| 2016-01-08 | Rated: 893. expected: 0.58708161286548 vs Scott Waites (831.86629745201) | 855 |
| 2016-01-08 | Rated: 893. expected: 0.58708161286548 vs Scott Waites (831.86629745201) | 855 |
| 2016-02-05 | Rated: 855. expected: 0.4792318152933 vs Scott Waites (869.4395206754) | 824 |
| 2016-02-05 | Rated: 855. expected: 0.4792318152933 vs Scott Waites (869.4395206754) | 824 |
| 2016-02-28 | Rated: 824. expected: 0.2429436208041 vs Connor Mullins (1021.4490893725) | 808 |
| 2016-02-28 | Rated: 824. expected: 0.2429436208041 vs Connor Mullins (1021.4490893725) | 808 |
| 2016-03-18 | Rated: 808. expected: 0.14778484683763 vs Jim Burris (1112.3677385019) | 799 |
| 2016-03-18 | Rated: 808. expected: 0.14778484683763 vs Jim Burris (1112.3677385019) | 799 |
| 2016-03-18 | Rated: 799. expected: 0.25115450444622 vs Richard Burton (988.78050006055) | 783 |
| 2016-03-18 | Rated: 799. expected: 0.25115450444622 vs Richard Burton (988.78050006055) | 783 |
| 2016-03-19 | Rated: 783. expected: 0.31445543245688 vs Alex Key (918.39063672591) | 827 |
| 2016-04-08 | Rated: 827. expected: 0.39631168509209 vs Scott Waites (900.11035685418) | 866 |
| 2016-04-08 | Rated: 827. expected: 0.39631168509209 vs Scott Waites (900.11035685418) | 866 |
| 2016-04-22 | Rated: 866. expected: 0.50651263074025 vs Scott Waites (861.47430470007) | 898 |
| 2016-04-22 | Rated: 866. expected: 0.50651263074025 vs Scott Waites (861.47430470007) | 898 |
| 2016-05-13 | Rated: 898. expected: 0.59678001246872 vs Scott Waites (829.89111306745) | 860 |
| 2016-05-13 | Rated: 898. expected: 0.59678001246872 vs Scott Waites (829.89111306745) | 860 |
| 2016-05-27 | Rated: 860. expected: 0.48836680076273 vs Scott Waites (868.08503386544) | 893 |
| 2016-05-27 | Rated: 860. expected: 0.48836680076273 vs Scott Waites (868.08503386544) | 893 |
| 2016-07-07 | Rated: 893. expected: 0.58222518232892 vs Scott Waites (835.34050911426) | 856 |
| 2016-07-07 | Rated: 893. expected: 0.58222518232892 vs Scott Waites (835.34050911426) | 856 |
| 2016-08-05 | Rated: 856. expected: 0.47612464748235 vs Scott Waites (872.60292078331) | 890 |
| 2016-08-05 | Rated: 856. expected: 0.47612464748235 vs Scott Waites (872.60292078331) | 890 |
| 2016-08-19 | Rated: 890. expected: 0.57276675043289 vs Scott Waites (839.07489822218) | 853 |
| 2016-08-19 | Rated: 890. expected: 0.57276675043289 vs Scott Waites (839.07489822218) | 853 |
| 2016-08-27 | Rated: 853. expected: 0.18681454314779 vs Dan Best (1108.5115683401) | 841 |
| 2016-09-10 | Rated: 841. expected: 0.15800043283909 vs Dan Best (1131.6614366194) | 831 |
| 2016-09-16 | Rated: 831. expected: 0.1432007851188 vs Dan Best (1141.7734643211) | 822 |
| 2016-09-24 | Rated: 822. expected: 0.13084351131178 vs Dan Best (1150.9383145688) | 878 |
| 2016-09-30 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 877.62601527605] expected: 0.77752572304481 vs Danno (1095) | 927 |
| 2016-10-08 | Rated: 927. expected: 0.27178027428733 vs Dan Best (1098.2178024557) | 910 |
| 2016-10-22 | Rated: 910. expected: 0.23440618479754 vs Dan Best (1115.6117400101) | 895 |
| 2016-10-29 | Rated: 895. expected: 0.20484203211592 vs Dan Best (1130.6137358372) | 946 |
| 2016-11-19 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.33518624429884 vs Dan Best (1064.9655238241) | 989 |
| 2016-11-25 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.45205618778096 vs Dan Best (1022.4174434592) | 1024 |
| 2016-12-03 | Rated: 1024. expected: 0.55255018813699 vs Dan Best (987.34903947718) | 989 |
| 2016-12-10 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.45163586003847 vs Dan Best (1022.7122515179) | 960 |
| 2016-12-17 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.3711259422449 vs Dan Best (1051.6169465604) | 1000 |
| 2017-01-07 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.57107629319466 vs Dan Best (950.27436746568) | 1027 |
| 2017-01-20 | Rated: 1027. expected: 0.7049056390829 vs Scott Waites (875.73197024988) | 982 |
| 2017-01-20 | Rated: 1027. expected: 0.7049056390829 vs Scott Waites (875.73197024988) | 982 |
| 2017-01-21 | Rated: 982. expected: 0.58434810459107 vs Dan Best (922.82325023013) | 945 |
| 2017-01-28 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.47810846349715 vs Dan Best (960.22152892396) | 978 |
| 2017-02-04 | Rated: 978. expected: 0.5731251079021 vs Dan Best (926.82047058778) | 941 |
| 2017-02-19 | Rated: 941. expected: 0.46575097604951 vs Dan Best (964.83598548114) | 975 |
| 2017-02-25 | Rated: 975. expected: 0.64867008514557 vs Dan Best (868.47650420073) | 933 |
| 2017-03-02 | Rated: 933. expected: 0.66897512069054 vs Tom Abromaitis (810.78026772697) | 954 |
| 2017-03-04 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.56299692272642 vs Dan Best (909.99138965005) | 918 |
| 2017-03-04 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 917.96819694551] expected: 0.54025370028881 vs Danno (946) | 889 |
| 2017-03-16 | ** Kermit Mullins [Rating: 888.54443376399] expected: 0.57773237272897 vs Danno (943) | 926 |
| 2017-03-16 | Rated: 926. expected: 0.27098244976431 vs Dave Mareske (1097.9187275835) | 973 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.46122190794283 vs Colman Quill (1000) | 943 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.46122190794283 vs Colman Quill (1000) | 943 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 943. expected: 0.37800166720931 vs Colman Quill (1029.5182021083) | 983 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 943. expected: 0.37800166720931 vs Colman Quill (1029.5182021083) | 983 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 983. expected: 0.46859042173685 vs Richard Burton (1004.8543883451) | 1017 |
| 2017-03-17 | Rated: 983. expected: 0.46859042173685 vs Richard Burton (1004.8543883451) | 1017 |
| 2017-03-18 | Rated: 1017. expected: 0.54905687449301 vs Francis Biss (982.80177484132) | 982 |
| 2017-03-18 | Rated: 982. expected: 0.50645370620543 vs Jeff Ital (977.5152565457) | 950 |
| 2017-04-07 | Rated: 950. expected: 0.54185787986378 vs Scott Waites (920.84593115119) | 947 |
| 2017-04-07 | Rated: 950. expected: 0.54185787986378 vs Scott Waites (920.84593115119) | 947 |
| 2017-04-08 | Rated: 947. expected: 0.58942888103298 vs Dan Best (884.18279381964) | 909 |
| 2017-04-15 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.48143496301132 vs Dan Best (921.90624220576) | 878 |
| 2017-04-29 | Rated: 878. expected: 0.4285149365116 vs Dan Best (928.01556781387) | 915 |
| 2017-05-06 | Rated: 915. expected: 0.53385294074468 vs Dan Best (891.44052375061) | 945 |
| 2017-05-13 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.63850338395873 vs Dan Best (846.1764131761) | 904 |
| 2017-06-03 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.47898690335608 vs Dan Best (918.61000052594) | 937 |
| 2017-06-10 | Rated: 937. expected: 0.57390698409827 vs Dan Best (885.26516234073) | 964 |
| 2017-07-01 | Rated: 964. expected: 0.72508424912898 vs Dan Best (795.52446066125) | 918 |
| 2017-07-08 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.53809162559981 vs Dan Best (891.47984118754) | 948 |
| 2017-07-15 | Rated: 948. expected: 0.6214081785233 vs Dan Best (861.91770522593) | 908 |
| 2017-07-22 | Rated: 908. expected: 0.44469153070426 vs Dan Best (946.59017556998) | 944 |
| 2017-07-28 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.40624417615791 vs Jeff Ital (1009.9282937428) | 918 |
| 2017-07-28 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.21867885026865 vs Rob Wirthlin (1139.2091194403) | 904 |
| 2017-07-28 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.21867885026865 vs Rob Wirthlin (1139.2091194403) | 904 |
| 2017-07-29 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.22722114401464 vs Rick Reinesch (1116.6425954931) | 889 |
| 2017-07-29 | Rated: 889. expected: 0.58259112521858 vs Dan Best (831.07912560689) | 916 |
| 2017-08-05 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.52730347410546 vs Dan Best (897.00871111372) | 882 |
| 2017-08-25 | Rated: 882. expected: 0.4405238856768 vs Scott Waites (923.52483546247) | 918 |
| 2017-08-25 | Rated: 882. expected: 0.4405238856768 vs Scott Waites (923.52483546247) | 918 |
| 2017-08-26 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.40797188143446 vs Dan Best (982.68484113607) | 956 |
| 2017-09-09 | Rated: 956. expected: 0.51611964318542 vs Dan Best (944.79504154788) | 923 |
| 2017-09-16 | Rated: 923. expected: 0.39557916937244 vs Dan Best (996.64240365915) | 898 |
| 2017-09-23 | Rated: 898. expected: 0.42720260264318 vs Dan Best (948.94685844199) | 935 |
| 2017-10-07 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.40694645008338 vs Dan Best (1000.4226582041) | 909 |
| 2017-10-08 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.38269380734255 vs Dan Best (992.05967963417) | 949 |
| 2017-10-13 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.58728803303541 vs Scott Waites (887.71836414579) | 911 |
| 2017-10-13 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.58728803303541 vs Scott Waites (887.71836414579) | 911 |
| 2017-10-14 | Rated: 911. expected: 0.40206062728376 vs Dan Best (979.9462422413) | 949 |
| 2017-10-21 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.45651511918477 vs Dan Best (979.29292063771) | 920 |
| 2017-10-28 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.44001897275556 vs Dan Best (961.88076403109) | 956 |
| 2017-11-03 | Rated: 956. expected: 0.54405937288274 vs Scott Waites (925.30479826005) | 921 |
| 2017-11-03 | Rated: 956. expected: 0.54405937288274 vs Scott Waites (925.30479826005) | 921 |
| 2017-11-04 | Rated: 921. expected: 0.4620575670559 vs Dan Best (947.41588631843) | 891 |
| 2017-11-11 | Rated: 891. expected: 0.49126729569012 vs Dan Best (897.06872158902) | 860 |
| 2017-11-18 | Rated: 860. expected: 0.34542779805372 vs Dan Best (971.04010951315) | 838 |
| 2017-12-01 | Rated: 838. expected: 0.33114616314264 vs Scott Waites (960.12459812455) | 817 |
| 2017-12-01 | Rated: 838. expected: 0.33114616314264 vs Scott Waites (960.12459812455) | 817 |
| 2017-12-02 | Rated: 817. expected: 0.26620042046023 vs Dan Best (993.14748858859) | 800 |
| 2017-12-09 | Rated: 800. expected: 0.22971552853603 vs Dan Best (1010.184315498) | 785 |
| 2017-12-16 | Rated: 785. expected: 0.2008652253217 vs Dan Best (1024.8861093244) | 772 |
| 2017-12-30 | Rated: 772. expected: 0.29068003821685 vs Dan Best (926.97078935116) | 753 |
| 2018-01-05 | Rated: 753. expected: 0.21176755629502 vs Scott Waites (981.31795256568) | 803 |
| 2018-01-05 | Rated: 753. expected: 0.21176755629502 vs Scott Waites (981.31795256568) | 803 |
| 2018-01-06 | Rated: 803. expected: 0.28805328252535 vs Dan Best (960.18986535001) | 785 |
| 2018-01-12 | Rated: 785. expected: 0.30159767344712 vs Scott Waites (930.87107616856) | 830 |
| 2018-01-12 | Rated: 785. expected: 0.30159767344712 vs Scott Waites (930.87107616856) | 830 |
| 2018-01-13 | Rated: 830. expected: 0.28349545365095 vs Dan Best (991.06914072414) | 876 |
| 2018-01-20 | Rated: 876. expected: 0.23870496179107 vs Dave Mareske (1077.4766211147) | 861 |
| 2018-01-27 | Rated: 861. expected: 0.38112683438728 vs Dan Best (945.21284975781) | 837 |
| 2018-02-03 | Rated: 837. expected: 0.3179225203347 vs Dan Best (969.60496715859) | 817 |
| 2018-02-10 | Rated: 817. expected: 0.26980901010406 vs Dan Best (989.95200846001) | 864 |
| 2018-02-16 | Rated: 864. expected: 0.46813326950784 vs Scott Waites (886.17332726918) | 898 |
| 2018-02-16 | Rated: 864. expected: 0.46813326950784 vs Scott Waites (886.17332726918) | 898 |
| 2018-02-24 | Rated: 898. expected: 0.4670338674197 vs Dan Best (920.94049503629) | 932 |
| 2018-03-03 | Rated: 932. expected: 0.56464012851146 vs Dan Best (886.83066255116) | 896 |
| 2018-03-10 | Rated: 896. expected: 0.46126821114002 vs Dan Best (922.96763077589) | 866 |
| 2018-03-16 | Rated: 866. expected: 0.42039617590501 vs Justin Williamson (921.78899413234) | 903 |
| 2018-03-16 | Rated: 866. expected: 0.42039617590501 vs Justin Williamson (921.78899413234) | 903 |
| 2018-03-16 | Rated: 903. expected: 0.53362699765192 vs Dan Best (879.59824327731) | 933 |
| 2018-03-16 | Rated: 933. expected: 0.34790499556135 vs Burnie Hegdahl (1042.1400833455) | 975 |
| 2018-03-17 | Rated: 975. expected: 0.28531239424505 vs Jim Burris (1134.5182449255) | 957 |
| 2018-03-17 | Rated: 975. expected: 0.28531239424505 vs Jim Burris (1134.5182449255) | 957 |
| 2018-03-17 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.43406703984662 vs Mike Bistodeau (1003.0832713931) | 929 |
| 2018-03-17 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.43406703984662 vs Mike Bistodeau (1003.0832713931) | 929 |
| 2018-03-24 | Rated: 929. expected: 0.4630277599924 vs Dan Best (954.73792212275) | 899 |
| 2018-04-06 | Rated: 899. expected: 0.56703968216274 vs Scott Waites (852.13385651768) | 863 |
| 2018-04-06 | Rated: 899. expected: 0.56703968216274 vs Scott Waites (852.13385651768) | 863 |
| 2018-04-07 | Rated: 863. expected: 0.36834063169757 vs Dan Best (956.69332523399) | 903 |
| 2018-04-14 | Rated: 903. expected: 0.480916346159 vs Dan Best (916.26712566263) | 936 |
| 2018-04-21 | Rated: 936. expected: 0.6141009692012 vs Dan Best (855.29356200761) | 961 |
| 2018-04-27 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.60295160434466 vs Scott Waites (888.42439617609) | 986 |
| 2018-04-27 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.60295160434466 vs Scott Waites (888.42439617609) | 986 |
| 2018-04-28 | Rated: 986. expected: 0.64848886377755 vs Dan Best (879.61462636984) | 944 |
| 2018-05-05 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.55465718116074 vs Dan Best (905.86792540756) | 909 |
| 2018-05-12 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.45355587600235 vs Dan Best (941.36598500185) | 944 |
| 2018-06-02 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.55390964688652 vs Dan Best (906.393561066) | 909 |
| 2018-06-09 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.45287429619757 vs Dan Best (941.84377846673) | 944 |
| 2018-06-16 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.59998548020584 vs Dan Best (873.57400609162) | 970 |
| 2018-06-22 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.64927751464081 vs Scott Waites (863.01329885415) | 928 |
| 2018-06-22 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.64927751464081 vs Scott Waites (863.01329885415) | 928 |
| 2018-06-23 | Rated: 928. expected: 0.6131735813086 vs Dan Best (847.97307682479) | 953 |
| 2018-07-13 | Rated: 953. expected: 0.56925259568349 vs Scott Waites (904.56705979116) | 981 |
| 2018-07-13 | Rated: 953. expected: 0.56925259568349 vs Scott Waites (904.56705979116) | 981 |
| 2018-07-14 | Rated: 981. expected: 0.25603851950783 vs Dave Mareske (1166.2980570782) | 965 |
| 2018-07-21 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.64823499808448 vs Dan Best (858.80806131663) | 924 |
| 2018-07-27 | Rated: 924. expected: 0.31107540491955 vs David Ginnard (1062.1224058129) | 904 |
| 2018-07-27 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.43185740552678 vs Richard Trippeer (951.64679154744) | 940 |
| 2018-07-28 | Rated: 940. expected: 0.52711479495491 vs Dan Best (921.14020822631) | 970 |
| 2018-07-28 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.61194062849316 vs Dan Best (890.87555510342) | 931 |
| 2018-07-28 | Rated: 931. expected: 0.32856151615584 vs Craig Walters (1055.1558142099) | 974 |
| 2018-07-28 | Rated: 931. expected: 0.32856151615584 vs Craig Walters (1055.1558142099) | 974 |
| 2018-08-04 | Rated: 974. expected: 0.507401377222 vs Dan Best (968.85662064538) | 942 |
| 2018-08-10 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.59246730648314 vs Scott Waites (876.99922591491) | 904 |
| 2018-08-10 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.59246730648314 vs Scott Waites (876.99922591491) | 904 |
| 2018-08-11 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.36348307000681 vs Dan Best (1001.3303087876) | 945 |
| 2018-09-08 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.64022933380727 vs Dan Best (844.87607269874) | 904 |
| 2018-10-19 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.48429415060954 vs Scott Waites (914.91713352983) | 873 |
| 2018-10-19 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.48429415060954 vs Scott Waites (914.91713352983) | 873 |
| 2018-10-20 | Rated: 873. expected: 0.48151471299953 vs Dan Best (885.8507500624) | 906 |
| 2018-10-27 | Rated: 906. expected: 0.57615415649234 vs Dan Best (852.66769169437) | 933 |
| 2018-11-03 | Rated: 933. expected: 0.64989564083012 vs Dan Best (825.54155770988) | 891 |
| 2018-11-10 | Rated: 891. expected: 0.53429075675763 vs Dan Best (867.13487872301) | 921 |
| 2018-11-17 | Rated: 921. expected: 0.61813652290766 vs Dan Best (837.3294871555) | 945 |
| 2018-12-01 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.68145902296336 vs Dan Best (812.89022462159) | 965 |
| 2019-01-05 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.72248136357941 vs Dan Best (798.78620160314) | 919 |
| 2019-01-11 | Rated: 919. expected: 0.60487849538416 vs Dan Best (845.02500887223) | 944 |
| 2019-01-12 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.67157429223605 vs Dan Best (819.73723257681) | 901 |
| 2019-01-19 | Rated: 901. expected: 0.55487037093026 vs Dan Best (862.71798727992) | 929 |
| 2019-01-26 | Rated: 929. expected: 0.63310062614645 vs Dan Best (834.22969101946) | 920 |
| 2019-02-01 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.46277867925543 vs Scott Waites (945.91195916884) | 954 |
| 2019-02-01 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.46277867925543 vs Scott Waites (945.91195916884) | 954 |
| 2019-02-02 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.65484777157344 vs Dan Best (842.74813109283) | 912 |
| 2019-02-02 | Rated: 912. expected: 0.53926671607794 vs Dan Best (884.65838847353) | 941 |
| 2019-02-08 | Rated: 941. expected: 0.6210644685331 vs Dan Best (855.17145830252) | 901 |
| 2019-02-16 | Rated: 901. expected: 0.50874952836126 vs Dan Best (894.91958428864) | 868 |
| 2019-02-22 | Rated: 868. expected: 0.43768132718396 vs Scott Waites (911.52979464119) | 840 |
| 2019-02-22 | Rated: 868. expected: 0.43768132718396 vs Scott Waites (911.52979464119) | 840 |
| 2019-02-23 | Rated: 840. expected: 0.28760010222409 vs Dan Best (997.57392495896) | 822 |
| 2019-03-01 | Rated: 822. expected: 0.24663495876591 vs Dan Best (1015.9803315013) | 870 |
| 2019-03-02 | Rated: 870. expected: 0.36290437325149 vs Dan Best (967.76496886233) | 911 |
| 2019-03-15 | Rated: 911. expected: 0.18923775157095 vs Scott Martin (1163.7542956305) | 899 |
| 2019-03-15 | Rated: 911. expected: 0.18923775157095 vs Scott Martin (1163.7542956305) | 899 |
| 2019-03-15 | Rated: 899. expected: 0.35860988804438 vs Ryan Ellet (1000) | 940 |
| 2019-03-15 | Rated: 899. expected: 0.35860988804438 vs Ryan Ellet (1000) | 940 |
| 2019-03-16 | Rated: 940. expected: 0.24164979150115 vs Rick Reinesch (1138.6733542986) | 925 |
| 2019-03-16 | Rated: 925. expected: 0.4512954639459 vs Ryan Ellet (958.95103283484) | 960 |
| 2019-03-16 | Rated: 925. expected: 0.4512954639459 vs Ryan Ellet (958.95103283484) | 960 |
| 2019-03-16 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.57250980387458 vs Dan Best (909.25729246344) | 987 |
| 2019-03-30 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.64680309506854 vs Dan Best (881.89791991141) | 1010 |
| 2019-04-06 | Rated: 1010. expected: 0.70423302361387 vs Dan Best (859.2933179958) | 965 |
| 2019-04-13 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.5863865911939 vs Dan Best (904.36423150708) | 991 |
| 2019-04-26 | Rated: 991. expected: 0.57351808691232 vs Scott Waites (939.54139958096) | 1018 |
| 2019-04-26 | Rated: 991. expected: 0.57351808691232 vs Scott Waites (939.54139958096) | 1018 |
| 2019-04-27 | Rated: 1018. expected: 0.64952941271343 vs Dan Best (910.82110170597) | 1040 |
| 2019-05-04 | Rated: 1040. expected: 0.71839622735151 vs Dan Best (877.30977031323) | 1058 |
| 2019-05-11 | Rated: 1058. expected: 0.75839189242251 vs Dan Best (859.28712886373) | 1009 |
| 2019-05-18 | Rated: 1009. expected: 0.68509175699914 vs Dan Best (873.97411467678) | 965 |
| 2019-06-01 | Rated: 965. expected: 0.56748320245194 vs Dan Best (917.81998712472) | 929 |
| 2019-06-08 | Rated: 929. expected: 0.46388519972337 vs Dan Best (954.13891208165) | 899 |
| 2019-06-14 | Rated: 899. expected: 0.48094590358413 vs Scott Waites (912.24655714335) | 932 |
| 2019-06-14 | Rated: 899. expected: 0.48094590358413 vs Scott Waites (912.24655714335) | 932 |
| 2019-06-29 | Rated: 932. expected: 0.4926300201062 vs Dan Best (937.12155749502) | 900 |
| 2019-07-06 | Rated: 900. expected: 0.47397830501907 vs Dan Best (918.09807711678) | 934 |
| 2019-07-13 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.570853040361 vs Dan Best (884.43268863801) | 961 |
| 2019-07-19 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.61582720462074 vs Scott Waites (879.02709497273) | 986 |
| 2019-07-19 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.61582720462074 vs Scott Waites (879.02709497273) | 986 |
| 2019-07-20 | Rated: 986. expected: 0.21075249545402 vs Dan Best, Dave Mareske (1215.3761966945) | 973 |
| 2019-07-26 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.60506521600885 vs Dan Best (898.88927964048) | 934 |
| 2019-07-26 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.49480000993665 vs Dan Best (937.61345346504) | 966 |
| 2019-07-26 | Rated: 966. expected: 0.48277471152179 vs Peter Ward (977.97409499726) | 935 |
| 2019-07-27 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.41545244117435 vs Richard Burton (994.31941438395) | 972 |
| 2019-07-27 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.41545244117435 vs Richard Burton (994.31941438395) | 972 |
| 2019-07-27 | Rated: 972. expected: 0.44492823984648 vs Gary Bradley (1010.4236644708) | 944 |
| 2019-07-27 | Rated: 972. expected: 0.44492823984648 vs Gary Bradley (1010.4236644708) | 944 |
| 2019-08-03 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.64290783313358 vs Dan Best (841.85264258486) | 903 |
| 2019-08-10 | Rated: 903. expected: 0.52875236558049 vs Dan Best (882.99874390541) | 933 |
| 2019-08-24 | Rated: 933. expected: 0.66535795965378 vs Dan Best (813.61005712859) | 954 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.31745268558939 vs Paul Lauger (1086.9815026888) | 934 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 954. expected: 0.31745268558939 vs Paul Lauger (1086.9815026888) | 934 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.39812606433772 vs Mark Harms (1005.7939703057) | 909 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.39812606433772 vs Mark Harms (1005.7939703057) | 909 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.38184535424271 vs Jeff Kouba (992.6838505831) | 949 |
| 2019-08-31 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.38184535424271 vs Jeff Kouba (992.6838505831) | 949 |
| 2019-09-07 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.21062323154737 vs Dan Best, Paul Works, Dave Mareske (1178.5112276346) | 936 |
| 2019-09-13 | Rated: 936. expected: 0.615264670762 vs Scott Waites (854.44003606846) | 897 |
| 2019-09-13 | Rated: 936. expected: 0.615264670762 vs Scott Waites (854.44003606846) | 897 |
| 2019-09-14 | Rated: 897. expected: 0.52578494265878 vs Dan Best (879.06687797722) | 927 |
| 2019-09-21 | Rated: 927. expected: 0.61078960931083 vs Dan Best (848.71711430738) | 952 |
| 2019-10-04 | Rated: 952. expected: 0.58295805072756 vs Scott Waites (893.81697499723) | 915 |
| 2019-10-04 | Rated: 952. expected: 0.58295805072756 vs Scott Waites (893.81697499723) | 915 |
| 2019-10-05 | Rated: 915. expected: 0.57892507157243 vs Dan Best (859.69481019509) | 878 |
| 2019-10-18 | Rated: 878. expected: 0.50544228075505 vs Dan Best (874.21816664463) | 846 |
| 2019-10-26 | Rated: 846. expected: 0.41371016008445 vs Dan Best (906.56647261295) | 884 |
| 2019-11-01 | Rated: 884. expected: 0.43259270388337 vs Scott Waites (931.12629024379) | 920 |
| 2019-11-01 | Rated: 884. expected: 0.43259270388337 vs Scott Waites (931.12629024379) | 920 |
| 2019-11-02 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.57281038285487 vs Dan Best (869.04392285835) | 883 |
| 2019-11-16 | Rated: 883. expected: 0.40838400484599 vs Dan Best (947.38847338955) | 921 |
| 2019-11-23 | Rated: 921. expected: 0.51650777903901 vs Dan Best (909.52504969969) | 920 |
| 2019-12-07 | Rated: 920. expected: 0.51355092339345 vs Dan Best (910.58154755819) | 887 |
| 2019-12-14 | Rated: 887. expected: 0.4194709784289 vs Dan Best (943.44880665537) | 924 |
| 2019-12-28 | Rated: 924. expected: 0.39233893587318 vs Dan Best, Dave Mareske, Paul Works (1000) | 963 |
| 2019-12-28 | Rated: 924. expected: 0.39233893587318 vs Dan Best, Dave Mareske, Paul Works (1000) | 963 |
| 2020-01-04 | Rated: 963. expected: 0.63309556264856 vs Dan Best (868.23347783335) | 922 |
| 2020-01-10 | Rated: 922. expected: 0.53904668773983 vs Scott Waites (894.81222329233) | 888 |
| 2020-01-10 | Rated: 922. expected: 0.53904668773983 vs Scott Waites (894.81222329233) | 888 |
| 2020-01-11 | Rated: 888. expected: 0.47017151766588 vs Dan Best (908.75159384286) | 890 |
| 2020-01-18 | Rated: 890. expected: 0.47578056090404 vs Dan Best (906.84257097347) | 924 |
| 2020-01-31 | Rated: 924. expected: 0.49235714785204 vs Scott Waites (929.31121130768) | 956 |
| 2020-01-31 | Rated: 924. expected: 0.49235714785204 vs Scott Waites (929.31121130768) | 956 |
| 2020-02-01 | Rated: 956. expected: 0.626334256232 vs Dan Best (866.27084796926) | 916 |
| 2020-02-08 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.51387492260462 vs Dan Best (906.35624036811) | 883 |
| 2020-02-14 | Rated: 883. expected: 0.48011893151556 vs Scott Waites (896.82206877021) | 916 |
| 2020-02-14 | Rated: 883. expected: 0.48011893151556 vs Scott Waites (896.82206877021) | 916 |
| 2020-02-15 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.46659867525062 vs Dan Best (939.2442354148) | 886 |
| 2020-02-22 | Rated: 886. expected: 0.38263006937567 vs Dan Best (969.10655063084) | 862 |
| 2020-02-28 | Rated: 862. expected: 0.49776984544029 vs Scott Waites (863.5496803872) | 894 |
| 2020-02-28 | Rated: 862. expected: 0.49776984544029 vs Scott Waites (863.5496803872) | 894 |
| 2020-02-29 | Rated: 894. expected: 0.36047244579566 vs Dan Best (993.59487507088) | 935 |
| 2020-03-06 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.64481611201681 vs Scott Waites (831.40695049538) | 958 |
| 2020-03-06 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.64481611201681 vs Scott Waites (831.40695049538) | 958 |
| 2020-03-07 | Rated: 958. expected: 0.53366661117736 vs Dan Best (934.57059176254) | 988 |
| 2020-03-13 | Rated: 988. expected: 0.73735703064842 vs Scott Waites (808.67518166446) | 941 |
| 2020-03-13 | Rated: 988. expected: 0.73735703064842 vs Scott Waites (808.67518166446) | 941 |
| 2020-03-14 | Rated: 941. expected: 0.5616580225062 vs Dan Best (897.93643839005) | 969 |
| 2020-03-20 | Rated: 969. expected: 0.6388937425628 vs Dan Best (869.88255183045) | 928 |
| 2020-03-21 | Rated: 928. expected: 0.5247731415902 vs Dan Best (910.77175135447) | 958 |
| 2020-03-25 | Rated: 958. expected: 0.14209860207797 vs Dave Mareske (1270.3390280006) | 1013 |
| 2020-03-28 | Rated: 1013. expected: 0.68212466316795 vs Dan Best (880.35723241624) | 1033 |
| 2020-04-03 | Rated: 1033. expected: 0.73490735745781 vs Scott Waites (855.86603162596) | 986 |
| 2020-04-03 | Rated: 1033. expected: 0.73490735745781 vs Scott Waites (855.86603162596) | 986 |
| 2020-04-04 | Rated: 986. expected: 0.67375947221749 vs Dan Best (860.01321085899) | 943 |
| 2020-04-08 | Rated: 943. expected: 0.5571215773095 vs Dan Best (903.13381708091) | 971 |
| 2020-04-09 | Rated: 971. expected: 0.63502409223623 vs Dan Best (874.78959802872) | 994 |
| 2020-04-10 | Rated: 994. expected: 0.69438328274132 vs Dan Best (851.43113993183) | 950 |
| 2020-04-11 | Rated: 950. expected: 0.57727275678907 vs Dan Best (895.87167002728) | 977 |
| 2020-04-18 | Rated: 977. expected: 0.59203668311245 vs Dan Best (912.30899890882) | 939 |
| 2020-04-23 | Rated: 939. expected: 0.41268238381894 vs Dan Best (1000.3028387446) | 977 |
| 2020-04-25 | Rated: 977. expected: 0.29820043176047 vs Dan Best, Dave Mareske (1125.6819315066) | 958 |
| 2020-05-01 | Rated: 958. expected: 0.51709615521281 vs Dan Best (946.11574181089) | 989 |
| 2020-05-02 | Rated: 989. expected: 0.60462410011952 vs Dan Best (915.20989574451) | 950 |
| 2020-05-08 | Rated: 950. expected: 0.53016484568048 vs Dan Best (929.01383267906) | 916 |
| 2020-05-08 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.51884333934946 vs Scott Waites (902.90010250326) | 947 |
| 2020-05-08 | Rated: 916. expected: 0.51884333934946 vs Scott Waites (902.90010250326) | 947 |
| 2020-05-09 | Rated: 947. expected: 0.47707028336617 vs Dan Best (962.94438280261) | 980 |
| 2020-05-14 | Rated: 980. expected: 0.58592242625648 vs Dan Best (919.69663557645) | 1007 |
| 2020-05-16 | Rated: 1007. expected: 0.65816114922075 vs Dan Best (893.19567085686) | 997 |
| 2020-05-20 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.65162881908315 vs Dan Best (888.21677497895) | 1019 |
| 2020-05-22 | Rated: 1019. expected: 0.17454009267697 vs Dave Mareske (1288.9203128598) | 1008 |
| 2020-05-23 | Rated: 1008. expected: 0.69378451397689 vs Dan Best (865.92101940027) | 964 |
| 2020-05-25 | Rated: 964. expected: 0.58484942323555 vs Dan Best (904.46463186699) | 927 |
| 2020-05-29 | Rated: 927. expected: 0.51721161626996 vs Dan Best (915.03541670603) | 894 |
| 2020-05-30 | Rated: 894. expected: 0.4319111928156 vs Dan Best (941.60870954739) | 866 |
| 2020-06-05 | Rated: 866. expected: 0.49121355455188 vs Scott Waites (872.10607622162) | 899 |
| 2020-06-05 | Rated: 866. expected: 0.49121355455188 vs Scott Waites (872.10607622162) | 899 |
| 2020-06-06 | Rated: 899. expected: 0.067693842024806 vs Dan Best, Dave Mareske (1354.6037556874) | 895 |
| 2020-06-12 | Rated: 895. expected: 0.57913704221739 vs Scott Waites (839.54374371294) | 858 |
| 2020-06-12 | Rated: 895. expected: 0.57913704221739 vs Scott Waites (839.54374371294) | 858 |
| 2020-06-13 | Rated: 858. expected: 0.24798882178149 vs Dan Best (1050.7168763803) | 906 |
| 2020-06-13 | Rated: 906. expected: 0.36447206241711 vs Dan Best (1002.5881609743) | 883 |
| 2020-06-19 | Rated: 883. expected: 0.50919704968128 vs Scott Waites (876.60851441485) | 914 |
| 2020-06-19 | Rated: 883. expected: 0.50919704968128 vs Scott Waites (876.60851441485) | 914 |
| 2020-06-21 | Rated: 914. expected: 0.3442907619937 vs Dan Best (1025.914372969) | 892 |
| 2020-06-26 | Rated: 892. expected: 0.30291576737023 vs Dan Best (1036.7853518845) | 937 |
| 2020-06-27 | Rated: 937. expected: 0.42126189408917 vs Dan Best (992.17196099621) | 910 |
| 2020-07-01 | Rated: 910. expected: 0.35979333264036 vs Dan Best (1010.1068326419) | 951 |
| 2020-07-03 | Rated: 951. expected: 0.39329083103221 vs Dan Best (1026.3066946799) | 990 |
| 2020-07-10 | Rated: 990. expected: 0.69710553121679 vs Scott Waites (845.19712559446) | 945 |
| 2020-07-10 | Rated: 990. expected: 0.69710553121679 vs Scott Waites (845.19712559446) | 945 |
| 2020-07-11 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.46935036246721 vs Dan Best (966.32428572752) | 979 |
| 2020-07-17 | Rated: 979. expected: 0.60545368238796 vs Dan Best (904.60682777578) | 940 |
| 2020-07-18 | Rated: 940. expected: 0.51236358382595 vs Dan Best (931.40715042616) | 907 |
| 2020-07-24 | Rated: 907. expected: 0.42885471030551 vs Dan Best (956.77456598899) | 944 |
| 2020-07-25 | Rated: 944. expected: 0.55044272153223 vs Dan Best (908.8291599867) | 909 |
| 2020-07-31 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.52758588399966 vs Scott Waites (889.81187959233) | 875 |
| 2020-07-31 | Rated: 909. expected: 0.52758588399966 vs Scott Waites (889.81187959233) | 875 |
| 2020-08-01 | Rated: 875. expected: 0.43260851961695 vs Dan Best (922.1150969565) | 847 |
| 2020-08-07 | Rated: 847. expected: 0.29380349868861 vs Dan Best (999.34743937725) | 828 |
| 2020-08-08 | Rated: 828. expected: 0.25075374271351 vs Dan Best (1018.1508632933) | 812 |
| 2020-08-14 | Rated: 812. expected: 0.24315720883669 vs Dan Best (1009.2474116548) | 860 |
| 2020-08-15 | Rated: 860. expected: 0.3588621919707 vs Dan Best (960.80947302037) | 901 |
| 2020-08-21 | Rated: 901. expected: 0.48092321973256 vs Dan Best (914.26234244912) | 934 |
| 2020-08-22 | Rated: 934. expected: 0.57562869704971 vs Dan Best (881.041428512) | 961 |
| 2020-08-28 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.55364817597445 vs Scott Waites (923.57737616831) | 990 |
| 2020-08-28 | Rated: 961. expected: 0.55364817597445 vs Scott Waites (923.57737616831) | 990 |
| 2020-08-29 | Rated: 990. expected: 0.69108066297671 vs Dan Best (850.12654116405) | 1010 |
| 2020-09-12 | Rated: 1010. expected: 0.74908718818633 vs Dan Best (819.99618720738) | 1026 |
| 2020-09-19 | Rated: 1026. expected: 0.72322755169302 vs Dan Best (859.13915722476) | 1044 |
| 2020-09-25 | Rated: 1044. expected: 0.70216952929787 vs Scott Waites (895.01085943067) | 999 |
| 2020-09-25 | Rated: 1044. expected: 0.70216952929787 vs Scott Waites (895.01085943067) | 999 |
| 2020-09-27 | Rated: 999. expected: 0.71240031588955 vs Dan Best (841.42572053311) | 953 |
| 2020-10-03 | Rated: 953. expected: 0.60962720535491 vs Dan Best (875.56608163119) | 978 |
| 2020-10-17 | Rated: 978. expected: 0.71099188452723 vs Dan Best (821.61815780511) | 996 |
| 2020-10-23 | Rated: 996. expected: 0.57997028471543 vs Scott Waites (939.94970930574) | 1023 |
| 2020-10-23 | Rated: 996. expected: 0.57997028471543 vs Scott Waites (939.94970930574) | 1023 |
| 2020-10-24 | Rated: 1023. expected: 0.72110119374859 vs Dan Best (857.98017635131) | 1041 |